Genres of Hostipitality: Rethinking Hindu-Muslim Relations in Modern South Asia

This paper builds on SherAli Tareen's monumental book, Perilous Intimacies: Debating Hindu-Muslim Friendship After Empire, to describe and analyze a range of multi-genre sources in Urdu that touch on Hindu-Muslim relations in modern South Asia. The paper takes Tareen's argument and theoretical assumptions to new texts to construct a theory of "genres of hostipitality." I extend this analysis by highlighting the concept of genre, and in turn raise questions about hostipitality's literary forms as well as relational forms that are embedded in certain texts not examined by Tareen. These texts include Shiblī Nu'mānī's "Hindu Musalmānõ kā ittiḥād," Sanā’ullāh Amritsarī's Ḥaqq prakāsh bajavāb Satiyārth prakāsh, ‘Abdur Raḥmān Shawq's Islām awr Hindustān, and Ḥasan Niẓāmī's Hindu mazhab kī ma‘lūmāt. I argue that these writings offer perceptive portals into the intellectual terrain in which “religion” was being constructed and contested in response to colonial modernity. The colonial-era Indo-Muslim authors whose writings I draw on to speak to Tareen's arguments appealed to a range of discursive paradigms, such as scripturalism, rationalism, history as well as historiography, and ethics of listening.